Amazon
Conflict of interest. This site uses Claude, by Anthropic, to read and summarise texts; Anthropic is one of the companies on this page. Claude gives no judgements or rankings. The categories of the Seoul safety frameworks (e.g. «does not cover severe risks») come from Claude's reading of the documents: the document is linked on each company's page.
1 · Who it is
- Headquarters
- United States · United States
- Why it is on this page
- signed the Seoul commitments (May 2024)
- Latest releases
- 12 models released in the last 24 months
- MolmoAct 2 5 Apr 2026
- Nova 2 2 Dec 2025
- Nova 2 Pro (Preview) 2 Dec 2025
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 2 Dec 2025
- Amazon Nova Premier 30 Apr 2025
2 · What it promised
Public commitments and signature status. Official lists have no dates: for names that appeared after our first reading of the list, the day we first saw them.
- signed
- signed
- signedFrozen archive: lists read from copies and articles on 26 October 2026 (the archive did not respond), to be rechecked.
- signeddate: Oct 2025List of submitted reports read on oecd.ai, without automated collection; report texts are not republished (all rights reserved).
- not applicableList read on AGORA (ETO/CSET, CC BY-NC, no automated collection) and copied into the file. The WeChat original cannot be opened by programs.
- EU AI Pact (opens in a new tab)25 Sep 2024signed
3 · What it wrote and changed
Under the Seoul commitments the companies promised to publish, by the Paris summit (10-11 February 2025), a safety framework on severe risks, with the thresholds beyond which they consider them intolerable.
safety framework published
- First version
- 9 Feb 2025
- Latest version
- 17 Sep 2026 · 2 versions found
- Risk thresholds
- the document contains risk thresholds This only says whether the document contains thresholds, not whether they are adequate.
Search by Claude of the company's websites on 27 Oct 2026, still to be checked again by a person.
Documents tracked over time
Versions of the text found in the copies of the Wayback Machine and Open Terms Archive: each point is a version that differs from the previous one.
Safety policy
Frontier Model Safety Framework (opens in a new tab)
Tracked through the Amazon Science page presenting the framework and linking the latest version's PDF.
Choose a point to read what changed.
First version seen on 24 Feb 2025
This version: archived copy (Wayback Machine) (opens in a new tab)
Usage policy
AWS Responsible AI Policy (opens in a new tab)
Choose a point to read what changed.
First version seen on 5 Oct 2024
This version: archived copy (Wayback Machine) (opens in a new tab)
Training data summary
Amazon Nova 2 Lite: AI Service Card (opens in a new tab)
Model card of Amazon Nova 2 Lite, with the training data summary.
Choose a point to read what changed.
First version seen on 12 Jan 2026
This version: archived copy (Wayback Machine) (opens in a new tab)
Summaries by Claude, checked by a person; the text of the documents belongs to the company: read it through the links.
4 · What others say
Stanford Foundation Model Transparency Index
39 out of 100 (average of the 13 rated companies: 41) · Dec 2025 edition
Data: Stanford CRFM, CC BY 4.0 licence · data and method (opens in a new tab)
Ratings by others: see SaferAI, risk management (opens in a new tab). Link only: their scores cannot be republished without permission.
Each rating measures different things on different companies: they are not comparable with each other.
5 · What happened
Incidents in which the company is named as developer of the system (AI Incident Database and AIAAIC).
- last 6 months
- 0
- last 12 months
- 9
- last 24 months
- 18
Severity, last 24 months: serious 0 · moderate 14 · minor 3 · not rated 1
- Washington State DOL's AI Phone System Reportedly Failed to Provide Spanish-Language Service to Callers Requesting Spanish (opens the United States page)
- Amazon AI agent-driven shopping trial sparks backlash (opens the United States page)
- Al system directs Amazon delivery van on to "dangerous" mudflats (opens the United Kingdom page)
- Kiro AI Coding Tool Was Reportedly Implicated in 13-Hour AWS Cost Explorer Outage in Mainland China (opens the China page)
- Malicious Nx npm Packages Reportedly Weaponize AI Coding Agents for Data Exfiltration
- Alleged Malicious Wiping Command Found in Amazon Q AI Assistant
- Amazon and Google AI Allegedly Promote Mein Kampf as 'a True Work of Art' in Search Results
- Amazon AI publishes false suicide helpline number (opens the United States page)
- Amazon replaces 14,000 jobs with AI
- Amazon AI anime dubs spark backlash over quality, ethics
- Amazon AI-generated Fallout Season 1 recap is riddled with errors (opens the United States page)
- Amazon charges local school districts different prices for same supplies (opens the United States page)
- AI-generated product listings flood Amazon (opens the United States page)
- Amazon sells AI-generated books about a monarch's cancer (opens the United Kingdom page)
- Lawsuit claims Amazon Buy Box algorithm overcharges shoppers (opens the United States page)
- AI researcher claims Amazon ignored copyright rules
- Arizona accuses Amazon of harming consumers with its Buy Box algorithm (opens the United States page)
- Amazon Alexa falsely attributes false facts to fact checking organisation (opens the United Kingdom page)
All incidents mentioning Amazon, in Explore incidents →Where the harm happens, in Connections →
6 · What we cannot see
- internal documents and unpublished safety evaluations;
- versions of documents that no archive saved;
- “no document found” is the result of a search, not proof that the document does not exist;
- signatory lists often have no dates: the date is the day we first saw the name;
- incidents the press does not report: the best-known companies have more recorded incidents because they are talked about more;
- many incidents do not have a severity yet;
- Chinese companies publish less in English and some of their commitments are read from third-party sources (AGORA).